DeSantis has become especially brazen in employing what is probably the most disturbing form that this post-Trump authoritarianism has taken. Credit: Photo by Gage Skidmore/Illustration by Jack Spatafora
The danger was never just Donald Trump. Thatโ€™s not to say he wasnโ€™t dangerous. Any far-right demagogue who achieves real power would be. But Trump is also an obvious buffoon too narcissistic to read the room or to get out of his own way. And as he shrinks into the background, an ever-shriller, ever-sadder voice begging for fealty from his own movement, the reality that he was the symptom, not the diseaseโ€”an opportunist, not a catalystโ€”has become blindingly apparent.

To anyone willing to remove their rose-tinted glasses, at least.

But our media and our country alike are only too happy to declare problems solved and move on. So after Trumpโ€™s slate of MAGA Senate candidates was wiped out in November, we collectively decided that the conspiratorial idiocy he seemed to have ushered in was on its way out, that normies were retaking the Republican Party, that the threats to democracy and the rule of law were subsiding. Peace in our time, and so on.

Of course, this admixture of naivete and willful ignorance can sustain neither scrutiny nor time. Seeds sown over decades have taken root, their toxic fruit ripening. Trump might be an absurd shadow pleading for relevance and dodging handcuffs. But the danger of the authoritarianism Trump heralded has not passed, and we canโ€™t afford to be numb to the new forms itโ€™s taken.

Letโ€™s start with a disregard for norms. Last year, in two 4-3 decisions split along party lines, North Carolinaโ€™s Supreme Court ruled that extreme partisan gerrymandering and a voter ID law passed by the Republican legislature violated the state constitution.

In November, two Republicans were elected to the court, shifting its balance of power. And the second they were sworn in, Republicans in the legislature made an extraordinary request: They asked the court to rehear those cases, not because the facts or the law had changed, but because the courtโ€™s political composition had.

In other words, they wanted the courtโ€™s Republicans to dispense with any charade that their actions would be governed by anything other than partisan politics; precedent didnโ€™t matter if the court didnโ€™t like it. And all five Republicans agreed.

To be fair, supreme courts overturn precedents all the time. But thereโ€™s always an attempt at a legal rationale, even if itโ€™s a thin reed, even if the result is obviously ideological. (See, e.g., Justice Alitoโ€™s screed overturning the right to abortion.)

Not here. The courtโ€”including the two new justices, who spent the previous year promising that their party wouldnโ€™t influence their decisionsโ€”decided that they have the majority, so theyโ€™ll help their party engage in vote suppression if they want to.
The precedent they set is that no precedent matters, and no one should imagine otherwise.

In one sense, that might not be a bad thing: If courts are going to be overtly political institutions at the beck and call of their party masters, letโ€™s not pretend theyโ€™re anything else.

But in another, it sends a perilous message: If you donโ€™t like a law passed by another faction, itโ€™s illegitimate. Healthy democracies canโ€™t function that way.

Related

Thatโ€™s the same logic that drove Florida Gov. Ron DeSantisโ€™ decision to remove Tampaโ€™s district attorney last year, a blatantly unconstitutional exercise of executive power to negate the views of voters DeSantis didnโ€™t like and substitute his own.

DeSantis has become especially brazen in employing what is probably the most disturbing form that this post-Trump authoritarianism has taken. In his budding troll campaign for presidentโ€”see, e.g., his tax exemption for gas stoves, things I donโ€™t recall seeing in the 30 years I lived in South and Central Floridaโ€”heโ€™s found an enemy to rally his troops against.

Several enemies, actually, all neatly packaged under whatever he defines as โ€œwokeโ€ today.

Drag queens. Transgender kids. Black history. Books.

Last week, the DeSantis administration moved to revoke the liquor license of the Orlando Philharmonic Plaza Foundation because a property it owns hosted a campy, all-ages drag show that, in DeSantisโ€™ mind, corrupted The Kids (at least, the three children the state documented attending the show) by subjecting them to dirty lyric changes in Christmas songs (definitely wouldnโ€™t zoom over a kidโ€™s head), performers whose outfits didnโ€™t cover their whole asses (scandalous), and an image of a finger pointing through a holiday wreath (a six-year-old would absolutely be traumatized by that innuendo!).

This is, naturally, from the same guy who canโ€™t shut his mouth about the rights of parents to choose whatโ€™s best for their childrenโ€”and itโ€™s not like anyone who went to that drag show didnโ€™t know what they were gettingโ€”while at the same time demanding to know teenage girlsโ€™ menstrual cycles.

But this has nothing to do with actual children being corrupted or the strip-club laws the state alleges the drag show broke.

DeSantis wants people to be mad at drag queens.

Just like he wants them pissed off at teachers and librarians and universities. Guys like DeSantis have nothing to offer but rage. Rage needs a target. It needs a sense of aggrievement, of victimhood, of entitlement. It makes people feel better about themselves by blaming someone else for their lifeโ€™s frustrationsโ€”and, in this case, justifying it as saving the children.

But itโ€™s never been about that. Itโ€™s just bullying as politics.

It infected the right long before Trump arrived. Purging him hasnโ€™t gotten rid of it.