As originally composed, Norman's bill would have made it a first-degree felony for anyone who took photos or video of a farm or its animals without the property owner's consent, including law enforcement officials.
But later in committee it was severely watered down to only becoming a misdemeanor, with provisions made for law enforcement and certain state agency officials to be able to conduct such surveillance.
The bill was opposed by a number of animal rights groups, including the very mainstream Humane Society, whose CEO, Wayne Pacelle, who said that the legislation threatened "not only animal welfare and food safety, but also free speech."
PETA was also opposed, with its senior vice president, Dan Matthews, making an appearance at USF to blast the bill as well, as he told the college audience that farms and slaughterhouses need mandatory video surveillance. Without the footage, he said, animal cruelty and employee turnover rates will sky rocket. "
Similar legislation was proposed in other states, such as in Iowa, where CNN commentators last month argued would probably be ruled unconstitutional if it was enacted.