Once again, a Florida judge has thrown out another mask lawsuit from Rep. Anthony Sabatini

The same court on Monday also dismissed an appeal of a Leon County mask requirement because Sabatini did not file an initial brief.

PHOTO VIA ANTHONY SABATINI/TWITTER
PHOTO VIA ANTHONY SABATINI/TWITTER

For the second time this week, the 1st District Court of Appeal on Thursday dismissed a challenge to a requirement that people wear masks in certain public places to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

The court dismissed a challenge to a Gadsden County ordinance because the plaintiff’s attorney, state Rep. Anthony Sabatini, R-Howey-in-the-Hills, did not file an amended notice of appeal as requested by the court.

Similarly, the court on Monday dismissed an appeal of a Leon County mask requirement because Sabatini did not file an initial brief. Sabatini told The News Service of Florida on Tuesday that he let the Leon County case be dismissed because the 1st District Court of Appeal is considering a challenge to an Alachua County mask requirement --- a case that could ultimately lead to a ruling by the Florida Supreme Court on such requirements.

Sabatini filed the Gadsden County case in July on behalf of plaintiff Gerald Carroll after the Gadsden County Commission required people to wear masks in public places where social distancing is difficult, such as in grocery stores and pharmacies. The lawsuit raised a series of constitutional issues, including alleging violations of privacy and due-process rights.

But Circuit Judge David Frank in August rejected the arguments. “The county's mask ordinance is logically related to the objective of promoting the health and welfare of Gadsden County residents during a pandemic,” Frank wrote in his ruling. “It was readily available, consistent with CDC (federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines, and reasonably expected to reduce hospitalizations and death. The ordinance passes constitutional muster." 

Sabatini filed a notice of appeal Aug. 26, and the Tallahassee-based appeals court immediately required that he file an amended notice with additional information.

On Oct. 6, the court issued an order giving Sabatini 10 days to comply with the Aug. 26 requirement. The order dismissing the case Thursday said the court did not receive a response.

Support local journalism in these crazy days. Our small but mighty team is working tirelessly to bring you up to the minute news on how Coronavirus is affecting Tampa and surrounding areas. Please consider making a one time or monthly donation to help support our staff. Every little bit helps.

Subscribe to our newsletter and follow @cl_tampabay on Twitter.

Support Local Journalism.
Join the Creative Loafing Tampa Bay Press Club

Local journalism is information. Information is power. And we believe everyone deserves access to accurate independent coverage of their community and state. Our readers helped us continue this coverage last year, and we are so grateful for the support.

Help us keep this coverage going. Whether it's a one-time acknowledgement of this article or an ongoing membership pledge, your support goes to local-based reporting from our small but mighty team.

Newsletters

Join Creative Loafing Tampa Bay Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.

We welcome readers to submit letters regarding articles and content in Creative Loafing Tampa Bay. Letters should be a minimum of 150 words, refer to content that has appeared on Creative Loafing Tampa Bay, and must include the writer's full name, address, and phone number for verification purposes. No attachments will be considered. Writers of letters selected for publication will be notified via email. Letters may be edited and shortened for space.

Email us at rroa@cltampa.com