Ozzy sues for Black Sabbath trademark. So what's more important — The Frontman or The Riff?

Few names resonate more with heavy metal fans than Ozzy Osbourne and Black Sabbath.  Interestingly enough, Ozzy's time in the band represents only a small portion of Sabbath's legacy.  Black Sabbath now has forty years and 18 albums under its belt.  Ozzy was around for eight albums, and two of them are so awful they damage his own legacy and justify his termination from the group in 1979.  Drummer Bill Ward and bassist/lyricist Terrence "Geezer" Butler left and rejoined before bolting for good in 1984.  Through all the substance abuse, through turbulent, revolving door lineups, and through parts of five decades - only guitarist Tony Iommi remained.

Why then is Ozzy Osbourne suing Tony Iommi for ownership of the 'Black Sabbath' trademark?  And why now?  Ozzy's statement:

"It is with great regret that I had to resort to legal action against my long-term partner Tony Iommi, but after three years of trying to resolve this issue amicably, I feel I have no other recourse.

"As of the mid-1990s, after constant and numerous changes in band members, the brand of 'BLACK SABBATH' was literally in the toilet and Tony Iommi (touring under the name BLACK SABBATH) was reduced to performing in clubs.

First of all, ten bucks says that's not Ozzy's statement - it's his harpy mouthpiece wife, Sharon's. 

Secondly, listening to a Black Sabbath album - whether a legendary Ozzy- or Dio-fronted LP, or the easily forgotten Tony Martin - there's no doubt for a second who stars.  Ozzy's vocals rarely deviated from directly following Iommi's riffs!

If Ozzy wants to argue about legacy, he should pop in a DVD of The Osbournes and look inward - or better yet, at his wife.

The Black Sabbath lawsuit made me wonder about other great bands - not just in heavy metal, but over all of rock and roll - where similar debates may rage. 

What's more important?  The Frontman or The Riff?  The debates and classic Sabbath video after the jump.