William Kilgore, of the St. Pete Tenants Union or SPTU, told council he’s worried the ordinance would be used to limit free speech.
“When we have a protest or when we have a call to action, you know, we set up a table, it doesn’t block anything and it doesn’t cause any disturbance” Kilgore told the council, “City Hall’s going to be in the purview of that new prohibited zone. So that’s going to affect our organizing abilities and things like that directly.”
Last August, residents camped out in front of City Hall protesting for rent control (which the state has preempted). That night, Allendale Methodist Pastor Andy Oliver was cited for trespassing by St. Pete Police Chief Anthony Holloway. In the aftermath, council member Ed Montanari questioned Holloway about why protestors hadn’t been arrested for putting tents on the sidewalk.
“Tell me about the law, if sidewalks are being blocked and there’s no permit and the police come and see that, are the tents supposed to be removed?” Montanari said.
“Yes sir, when I was here the sidewalk was not blocked,” Holloway said then. “We could only cite one person because he said the tents belonged to him. I made the decision to have the tents removed first thing in the morning.”
Holloway assured Montanari that it “won’t happen again.”
St. Pete’s current table ordinance bans tables in any right of way along a specific area of downtown. Under Driscoll’s expansion, that area would include the Pier, the Edge and Grand Central Districts along with City Hall and other areas downtown. The current definition blocking the right-of-way means the entirety of the stretch of sidewalk is blocked, but the new language could apply to a table blocking just a portion. As Laura Roe, a manager in St. Petersburg’s Police’s Legal Division, said last month “It’s not the crowd that’s the problem. It’s the table that’s drawing the crowd.”

“I used to go out and play music, busking, on Central Avenue with an acoustic guitar, a milk crate, and a receptacle for tips,” Kilgore told council.“That becomes covered under this. You’re affecting all kinds of people; street performers, artists, non-commercial activities, you’re affecting a wide variety of people.”
Council member Deborah Figgs-Sanders and Richie Floyd voted against the proposal. Floyd said he doesn’t think council should leave these kinds of interpretations up to SPPD.
“I’m very sensitive to issues where we’re regulating what kinds of social behaviors can be allowed,” Floyd said. “I just don’t want us to have to be relying on how we expect our police department to interpret things.”
The second hearing and final vote on St. Petersburg’s updated sidewalk activity ordinance is scheduled for June 15.
Subscribe to Creative Loafing newsletters.
Follow us: Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter
This article appears in Jun 1-7, 2023.

