But these three actors are almost alone in their excellence. True, a few of their colleagues are almost credible: Michael DeMouchel might make a potent King Claudius if he didnt seem so monotonously somber from first moment to last (and hes also hard to hear), and Robert Colwell as Polonius is almost believable, though he doesnt ever seem to have really won the kings, or Laertes confidence. Ian Gabriel Gonzalez-Muentener is a likable if bland Horatio, and Levi Landry and Thomas Massey are a tolerable Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. As to the very minor parts, most of the SPSC actors are just miscast. This is no more acceptable in a drama than in a violin concerto: you dont have to be a soloist to mar a performance.
And then theres Prince Hamlet. Benjamin Boucvalt, a student at the FSU/Asolo Conservatory in Sarasota, plays him vibrantly and heroically which is to say, all wrong. First, Hamlet should seem depressed. He tells us hes suicidal in his opening soliloquy Oh that this too too solid flesh would melt explains further to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern I have of late and wherefore I know not lost all my mirth and clinches the argument in the To be or not to be speech To die, to sleep no more and by a sleep to say we end the heartache, and the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to. But Boucvalt plays the part forcefully, vividly, as if high on adrenalin. Hamlets feigned madness is another problem. Upon hearing from his fathers ghost that Claudius was his killer, Hamlet tells his friends that from here on hell put an antic disposition on that is, act insane. But why? If his intent is to be better placed to kill Claudius, lunacy will only make him seem more, and not less dangerous. And is he pretending at all? Is the mission that ghost has set for him so imponderable that its driven him crazy? There are other questions, but Boucvalt in this production answers none of them, and in fact never appears specially unbalanced, so the whole mystery gets lost. In fact, the only extended period during which Boucvalt is convincing is in the last scenes of the play, when his miraculous return to Denmark has convinced him that theres special providence in the fall of a sparrow. Of course, this is too late to salvage the role or the production. But the coherence of these last scenes, coupled with a terrifically realistic fencing match (choreographed by Chris Fields), make the end of the play more satisfying than the start. Since the production takes nearly three hours, though, this is a long time to wait.
Richard Miller directs, and though hes fine at moving bodies around a stage, one wishes he had an interpretation of this perplexing drama. Jonathan Robbens two-level set on the wide and deep Bininger stage (which fortunately boasts a trap door for the gravedigger scene) is abstract and utilitarian, and Rebeka Sweets period costumes are easy on the eyes. The Bininger tends to swallow up dialogue, but this is a problem that can be addressed easily enough. The other difficulties are more troubling.
In any case, welcome to the SPSC. Dont be put off by small crowds at first, or, for that matter, by carping critics: other companies have started off shakily, and evolved into something wonderful. This Hamlet is problematic, but the futures unwritten. Show us what you can do.