William Kilgore, of the St. Pete Tenants Union or SPTU, told council heโs worried the ordinance would be used to limit free speech.
โWhen we have a protest or when we have a call to action, you know, we set up a table, it doesn’t block anything and it doesnโt cause any disturbanceโ Kilgore told the council, โCity Hallโs going to be in the purview of that new prohibited zone. So that’s going to affect our organizing abilities and things like that directly.โ
Last August, residents camped out in front of City Hall protesting for rent control (which the state has preempted). That night, Allendale Methodist Pastor Andy Oliver was cited for trespassing by St. Pete Police Chief Anthony Holloway. In the aftermath, council member Ed Montanari questioned Holloway about why protestors hadnโt been arrested for putting tents on the sidewalk.
โTell me about the law, if sidewalks are being blocked and thereโs no permit and the police come and see that, are the tents supposed to be removed?โ Montanari said.
โYes sir, when I was here the sidewalk was not blocked,โ Holloway said then. โWe could only cite one person because he said the tents belonged to him. I made the decision to have the tents removed first thing in the morning.โ
Holloway assured Montanari that it โwonโt happen again.โ
St. Peteโs current table ordinance bans tables in any right of way along a specific area of downtown. Under Driscollโs expansion, that area would include the Pier, the Edge and Grand Central Districts along with City Hall and other areas downtown. The current definition blocking the right-of-way means the entirety of the stretch of sidewalk is blocked, but the new language could apply to a table blocking just a portion. As Laura Roe, a manager in St. Petersburgโs Policeโs Legal Division, said last month โIt’s not the crowd that’s the problem. It’s the table that’s drawing the crowd.โ

โI used to go out and play music, busking, on Central Avenue with an acoustic guitar, a milk crate, and a receptacle for tips,โ Kilgore told council.โThat becomes covered under this. Youโre affecting all kinds of people; street performers, artists, non-commercial activities, you’re affecting a wide variety of people.โ
Council member Deborah Figgs-Sanders and Richie Floyd voted against the proposal. Floyd said he doesnโt think council should leave these kinds of interpretations up to SPPD.
โI’m very sensitive to issues where we’re regulating what kinds of social behaviors can be allowed,โ Floyd said. โI just don’t want us to have to be relying on how we expect our police department to interpret things.โ
The second hearing and final vote on St. Petersburgโs updated sidewalk activity ordinance is scheduled for June 15.
Subscribe to Creative Loafing newsletters.
Follow us: Google News | NewsBreak | Reddit | Instagram | Facebook | Twitter
This article appears in Jun 1-7, 2023.


