Credit: Photo via Camping World Stadium website
A federal judge heard arguments Tuesday in a more than five-year legal battle over whether the Florida High School Athletic Association violated a Christian schoolโ€™s free-speech rights by preventing a prayer from being read over a loudspeaker before a football game.

The case stems from the 2015 class 2A state championship game in Orlandoโ€™s Camping World Stadium between Cambridge Christian School of Tampa, which filed the lawsuit, and Jacksonvilleโ€™s University Christian School.

U.S. District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell in 2017 dismissed the case, rejecting Cambridge Christianโ€™s arguments that blocking the prayer was a violation of the First Amendment. But in 2019, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Honeywellโ€™s ruling, sending the case back to the Tampa-based district court.

Jesse Panuccio, an attorney representing Cambridge Christian, argued during Tuesdayโ€™s hearing before Honeywell that the FHSAA displayed โ€œviewpoint discrimination and arbitrarinessโ€ in its decision to block the prayer from being read over the stadiumโ€™s public address system.

Part of the Christian schoolโ€™s argument is that the FHSAA allowed a pre-game prayer over the loudspeaker at a 2012 state championship at the same stadium.

โ€œThere are two data points, two times that schools requested to pray at the class 2A championship game. And in 50 percent of them, the FHSAA approved the request. That is arbitrary application,โ€ Panuccio said.

The FHSAA, however, said in a motion for summary judgment that it is a โ€œstate actorโ€ that hosted the championship game in a publicly owned stadium and that speech over loudspeakers at such events is tightly controlled.

The athletic association contended that speech over loudspeakers at its events is considered โ€œgovernment speechโ€ and that messages or prayers โ€” or โ€œprivate speechโ€ โ€” could be construed as being endorsed by the FHSAA.

In a motion for summary judgement filed in April, Cambridge Christianโ€™s attorneys argued the athletic association has no written policy prohibiting prayers being read over a loudspeaker. Cambridge Christian also contended that the FHSAA has previously written messages of a religious nature on its various social media accounts.

In addition, Panuccio pointed to the FHSAA allowing โ€œsecular invocationsโ€ like moments of silence.

โ€œOne example is this one, this was following the terrible tragedy at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in 2018, after which the association rightly asked the crowd to, quote, โ€˜Join together in mourning,โ€™ with a 20- to 30-second moment of silent reflection and to provide, quote, โ€˜positive thoughts.โ€™ The FHSAA did this at every single championship match in every sport in the winter and spring of 2018,โ€ Panuccio said.

Judith Mercier, an attorney representing the athletic association, said the tribute to lives lost in the Parkland school shooting was โ€œthe FHSAAโ€™s speechโ€ and was different from allowing religious speech from individuals or schools.

โ€œThe First Amendment does not prevent the FHSAA from asking people to kind of recognize the horrific tragedy at one of their member schools where a number of people died. The FHSAA isnโ€™t muzzled to be able to say something like that or prevented from saying that unless they opened it up to other people to say what they want,โ€ Mercier said.

Honeywell did not give a specific date for when she will issue an order. She said a backlog of criminal cases that were delayed by COVID-19 will push back the release of her order by at least 30 days.