On Sunday morning talk shows, Democrats uncertain on procedures for passing health care bill

Meanwhile, back to whether the House can somehow corral a majority to support a Senate bill.  Cable news' favorite Florida House Democrat, Debby Wasserman-Schultz, boldly declared when queried by NBC's David Gregory on Meet The Press that yes, a health care bill will pass, saying, "When we start counting, the votes will be there."


The South Florida Representative also was on message to claim that Republican calls to "just start over" (which a CNN/Opinion Research poll now indicates is what the American public prefers) was code for killing the bill outright.


That was a little more convincing than the very non-political Nancy-Anne De Parle, the Obama administration's health reform director, who tried her best not to answer that question as posed by Gregory.


As you sit here today, do you have the votes to get this passed in Congress?


MS. DePARLE:  Well, David, what the president wanted to do is bring everybody together again, as he has before during this process, to really have an open and honest discussion about what's at stake here for the American people. What with people losing their coverage, with premiums skyrocketing, you know, how do we deal with these problems?  And I think we achieved that this week. And...


MR. GREGORY:  Do you have the votes, though, in Congress to pass it?


MS. DePARLE:  What he wants to do, David, is to make sure that he's fighting for American families and businesses by doing something about this problem, to reduce their costs, to make it more accessible, to give them the kind of options and choices and protections that members of Congress have.  And I believe...


MR. GREGORY:  OK.  But, but, but my question is, do you have the votes?


MS. DePARLE:  I believe that we will have the votes to pass this in Congress.


On Saturday, CL asked the same question of Tampa area Democratic Representative Kathy Castor.  She said,  "This is decades old.  Families and small businesses have waited for decades for this change.  Now we're at this procedural point where they gotta get the majority vote packaged up in the Senate.  That's really what's taking up the time.  Once they submit that reconciliation package in the Senate.  If it doesn't conform to the rules, the Parliamentarian can just say no and reject that. "


(That Senate Parliamentarian Castor refers to is Alan Frumin. This nameless, faceless bureaucrat may singlehandedly decide on the future of health care in this country — or at least the bill that the Democrats are pushing this year.)


Castor also said that there are reasons why the House just can't vote up or down on the Senate bill that passed on Christmas Eve morning.  She said, "One thing that's in the Senate bill that most people don't realize is that the Senate exempted all large group plans, about 180 million Americans  from the consumer protections like pre-existing conditions.  That's one reason why the House just couldn't take up the Senate bill and pass it."

Three days after the all-day health care summit at Blair House, the nearly year-old question — can President Obama and Congressional Democrats pass a health care reform bill? —  was asked of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other officials with skin in the game on the Sunday morning public affairs programs.

The shows also reflected what's been apparent over the past year — that Democrats can't get their act together, as several of their leaders contradicted each other on Sunday talk.

Nancy Pelosi was featured on CNN and ABC's This Week (with Elizabeth Vargas sitting in this week).  When asked the critical question about whether she has the votes,  Pelosi said it depends on what happens in the Senate initially.  Translation: She probably doesn't right now.

When asked if she's ready to pass the bill, even though general health care polls show that the public doesn't favor that now, Madame Speaker said come hell or high water (or more of her members losing in November), health care has to happen now:

PELOSI: Well first of all our members — every one of them — wants health care. I think everybody wants affordable health care for all Americans. They know that this will take courage. It took courage to pass Social Security. It took courage to pass Medicare. And many of the same forces that were at work decades ago are at work again against this bill.

But the American people need it, why are we here? We're not here just to self perpetuate our service in Congress. We're here to do the job for the American people. To get them results that gives them not only health security, but economic security, because the health issue is an economic issue for — for America's families.

But on CBS's Face the Nation, Pelosi's #2 in the House, Maryland's Steny Hoyer, was singing a different tune.  He said that the House would probably have to blink first, saying

REPRESENTATIVE STENY HOYER: We—whether we're willing or not, we have to go first if

we're going to correct some of the things that the House disagrees with, correct, change so that

we can reach agreement, the House will have to move first on some sort of corrections or

reconciliation bill, which follows the process that the Republicans followed sixteen out of the last

twenty-two times it's been done for very major pieces including their tax cuts, which were really

a more—

Speaking of reconciliation, we've been hearing more reports that that's the way the president intends to push the bill through the Senate, which means it would require only 51, and not 60 votes.  We've heard some Senate Democrats aren't in agreement with that.  Too bad for the White House that one of them was North Dakota's Kent Conrad, who told Face host Bob Scheiffer  that,

SENATOR KENT CONRAD: Bob, let's just understand the question of reconciliation—question

of reconciliation. I have said all year as chairman of the Budget Committee, reconciliation

cannot be used to pass comprehensive health care reform. It won’t work. It won’t work because

it was never designed for that kind of significant legislation. It was designed for deficit reduction.

So, let’s be clear. On the major Medicare or health care reform legislation, that can’t move to

reconciliation. The role for reconciliation would be very limited. It would be on sidecar issues

designed to improve what passed the Senate and what would have to pass the House for health

care reform to move forward. So, using reconciliation would not be for the main package at all. It

would be for certain sidecar issues like how much does the federal government put up to pay for

the Medicaid expansion? What is done to improve the affordability of the package that’s come

out of the Senate?

All of this is instructive in showing why, with clear majorities in both houses of Congress this year, the Dems haven't been able to push this ball over the goal line.

WE LOVE OUR READERS!

Since 1988, CL Tampa Bay has served as the free, independent voice of Tampa Bay, and we want to keep it that way.

Becoming a CL Tampa Bay Supporter for as little as $5 a month allows us to continue offering readers access to our coverage of local news, food, nightlife, events, and culture with no paywalls.

Join today because you love us, too.

Scroll to read more News Feature articles

Join Creative Loafing Tampa Bay Newsletters

Subscribe now to get the latest news delivered right to your inbox.